Instead of totally describing each potentiality, the court concluded that the specification must provide sufficient disclosure to “reliably allow a person skilled in the artwork to make and use all of what is claimed, not merely a subset” permitting for a reasonable amount of experimentation. The threshold for enablement can usually be difficult to establish, but here the Supreme Court made clear that Amgen’s specification was more of a analysis project than an enabling disclosure. The Court also famous that whether experimentation is cheap is determined by the context, citing Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Hyde, 242 U.S. 261 .
- It